Part 2 - Scientific Fraud
Dealing With the Governments Grant-Paid 'Scientists' (Read Prostitutes).
In Part 1, ‘Does Cannabis Cause …
Crime?’ we learned how to deal with the ignorant when it comes to
Cannabis. The same 3 points can be used for any other allegation
against Cannabis. Basically, without those claims manifesting
themselves empirically, it’s simply not true.
We already know how to deal with the ignorant, but how do we deal with those who deliberately lie about Cannabis, namely the ‘scientific experts’. These people are not ignorant, they know exactly that what they are doing is deceitful so dealing with them means exposing their weaknesses and not trying to match them point for point. These diabolical people are masters of manipulation who are fully aware that if they don’t give the whole story, the general public will get a completely false impression of what’s going on, and definitely come to a false conclusion. That is how easy it is to manipulate the minds of people. Just look at all the claims below which were also made by the ‘government experts of the day’ but which we now know today to be false.
Over the years I have found the depending on the age group I am dealing with, their indoctrinated reasons are all the same for that particular age group.
Those born before 1960 were tutored by the experts that Cannabis causes crime. Just one puff, tomorrow you will be so addicted to Cannabis that it’s on to crime to pay for your habit and eventually murder! (Read part 1)
1960’s and 1980’s children were trained by the experts that Cannabis is the gateway drug. Just one puff, instantly you are addicted to Cannabis, and astonishingly enough addicted to every other nasty drug, especially heroin or crack, even though you have never used them or wanted to. Chase that dragon. (Not even in fairytales or science fiction does such a substance exist yet people still claim this to this day.)
Anyone born after 1990 was taught by the experts that Cannabis causes Psychosis. Just one puff, and that’s it, your crazy. Just like that you are schizophrenic. Mad! (Funny how the most addicted to power and control keep claiming justification for their actions with the psychosis theory. Just like the rest of the mass-murdering leaders – Joseph Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Verwoerd etc.)
Those who are born from 2010 are going to be told by the experts that Cannabis ‘smoke’ puts carbon into the atmosphere and will destroy the planet. Just one puff, and the earth will heat up so much everyone will fry! (Or it will cool down so much that everyone will freeze. The climate ‘experts’ keep changing their minds depending on the season as to what will happen that I can never keep up anymore.)
The empirical arguments of Part 1 will still work against the experts, but in this new religion, ‘The Belief In Science’, where thy shall have no other God’s before me and every knee shall bow, the new priesthood in their white lab coats will just say a few scientific (religious) words that will cloud the minds of the believers again. It’s very easy to confuse anyone with a language no one understands.
So how do you deal with these conmen? To beat a scientist in a debate or in court, you need to take them outside their area of expertise. Just because they wear a white lab coat, name badge and walk around with a clipboard while speaking with authority does not mean they are now divine, infallible or above reproach. Their claims are immaterial and invalid simply because;
• The harm they speak about does not even nearly justify the laws. Prohibition is based on the allegations of serious harm. If a scientist claims something, so what? Is that something so serious and only caused by herb Cannabis to such a serious degree that EVERYONE must be punished? Of course not!
• They don’t take into account Human Rights. Apartheid was based on the exact same principles and philosophy. One black man might cause a problem; therefore we can punish all black men. Legally, morally and Human Rights speaking, you can’t punish someone for something someone else MIGHT do or experience. These scientists support the automatic assumption of guilt, which is illegal. But history shows us the even Hitler had scientists supporting his eugenics policies, which is why we don’t base laws on principles or philosophy or government controlled scientists.
• It’s not their job to justify the government’s actions. The government makes the laws, not the scientists. The government must therefore justify those laws, not the scientists. Did you vote for those scientists?
• They actually have no authority over you. They are exactly the same as you, they were not born out of special wombs.
• The government ultimately controls what can be studied and will never permit any herb Cannabis studies. So the very same authority that prohibits Cannabis also hands out the grants (huge money) and bestows permission on how THC can be studied! Why would the South African government fund or permit any herb Cannabis studies that would show they had been deliberately deceitful towards the public, and how can any study be claimed as ‘science’ when this is the case? That’s called a conflict of interest.
• Scientists are only employees of the government and paid with grants to ‘re-search’ for the government. The government presents the conclusion BEFORE the study takes place and the scientists just follow a ‘scientific procedure’. The government defines the ‘Aim’, ‘Apparatus’ and ‘Method’ of the study. The scientists are only employed to write the logically pre-determined ‘results’ and ‘conclusion’ on THC. This is control not neutral, empirical science. Quite frankly, it’s government maintained scientific fraud!
For those of you that don’t know, the Department of Science is not a big science lab where government scientists work tirelessly to test everything and make sure it’s safe for you. It’s a building full of money controlled by bureaucrats that don’t know anything about science. Unlike in the movies, scientists don’t work on their own projects. Just like you, they have a boss (government) and a job description. The word ‘scientific’ only means the procedure is ‘based on the methods and principles of science’, while the word ‘science’ actually means the ‘systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment’. Without natural world observation (empirical studies into peoples actual use of the Cannabis herb), it’s only an experimental claim.
The government can never legally justify any law and no scientist can claim their studies are objective if they censor and control the parameters of the study. These ‘Cannabis’ (read THC) studies are 100% completely manipulated and the results pre-determined to keep political control, and have nothing to do with harm reduction or Cannabis herb. That’s why this ridiculous ‘THC-scientific’ con won’t stand up in court and it’s only ever mentioned in the media. Eureka- you’ve got it!
We already know how to deal with the ignorant, but how do we deal with those who deliberately lie about Cannabis, namely the ‘scientific experts’. These people are not ignorant, they know exactly that what they are doing is deceitful so dealing with them means exposing their weaknesses and not trying to match them point for point. These diabolical people are masters of manipulation who are fully aware that if they don’t give the whole story, the general public will get a completely false impression of what’s going on, and definitely come to a false conclusion. That is how easy it is to manipulate the minds of people. Just look at all the claims below which were also made by the ‘government experts of the day’ but which we now know today to be false.
Over the years I have found the depending on the age group I am dealing with, their indoctrinated reasons are all the same for that particular age group.
Those born before 1960 were tutored by the experts that Cannabis causes crime. Just one puff, tomorrow you will be so addicted to Cannabis that it’s on to crime to pay for your habit and eventually murder! (Read part 1)
1960’s and 1980’s children were trained by the experts that Cannabis is the gateway drug. Just one puff, instantly you are addicted to Cannabis, and astonishingly enough addicted to every other nasty drug, especially heroin or crack, even though you have never used them or wanted to. Chase that dragon. (Not even in fairytales or science fiction does such a substance exist yet people still claim this to this day.)
Anyone born after 1990 was taught by the experts that Cannabis causes Psychosis. Just one puff, and that’s it, your crazy. Just like that you are schizophrenic. Mad! (Funny how the most addicted to power and control keep claiming justification for their actions with the psychosis theory. Just like the rest of the mass-murdering leaders – Joseph Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Verwoerd etc.)
Those who are born from 2010 are going to be told by the experts that Cannabis ‘smoke’ puts carbon into the atmosphere and will destroy the planet. Just one puff, and the earth will heat up so much everyone will fry! (Or it will cool down so much that everyone will freeze. The climate ‘experts’ keep changing their minds depending on the season as to what will happen that I can never keep up anymore.)
The empirical arguments of Part 1 will still work against the experts, but in this new religion, ‘The Belief In Science’, where thy shall have no other God’s before me and every knee shall bow, the new priesthood in their white lab coats will just say a few scientific (religious) words that will cloud the minds of the believers again. It’s very easy to confuse anyone with a language no one understands.
So how do you deal with these conmen? To beat a scientist in a debate or in court, you need to take them outside their area of expertise. Just because they wear a white lab coat, name badge and walk around with a clipboard while speaking with authority does not mean they are now divine, infallible or above reproach. Their claims are immaterial and invalid simply because;
• The harm they speak about does not even nearly justify the laws. Prohibition is based on the allegations of serious harm. If a scientist claims something, so what? Is that something so serious and only caused by herb Cannabis to such a serious degree that EVERYONE must be punished? Of course not!
• They don’t take into account Human Rights. Apartheid was based on the exact same principles and philosophy. One black man might cause a problem; therefore we can punish all black men. Legally, morally and Human Rights speaking, you can’t punish someone for something someone else MIGHT do or experience. These scientists support the automatic assumption of guilt, which is illegal. But history shows us the even Hitler had scientists supporting his eugenics policies, which is why we don’t base laws on principles or philosophy or government controlled scientists.
• It’s not their job to justify the government’s actions. The government makes the laws, not the scientists. The government must therefore justify those laws, not the scientists. Did you vote for those scientists?
• They actually have no authority over you. They are exactly the same as you, they were not born out of special wombs.
• The government ultimately controls what can be studied and will never permit any herb Cannabis studies. So the very same authority that prohibits Cannabis also hands out the grants (huge money) and bestows permission on how THC can be studied! Why would the South African government fund or permit any herb Cannabis studies that would show they had been deliberately deceitful towards the public, and how can any study be claimed as ‘science’ when this is the case? That’s called a conflict of interest.
• Scientists are only employees of the government and paid with grants to ‘re-search’ for the government. The government presents the conclusion BEFORE the study takes place and the scientists just follow a ‘scientific procedure’. The government defines the ‘Aim’, ‘Apparatus’ and ‘Method’ of the study. The scientists are only employed to write the logically pre-determined ‘results’ and ‘conclusion’ on THC. This is control not neutral, empirical science. Quite frankly, it’s government maintained scientific fraud!
For those of you that don’t know, the Department of Science is not a big science lab where government scientists work tirelessly to test everything and make sure it’s safe for you. It’s a building full of money controlled by bureaucrats that don’t know anything about science. Unlike in the movies, scientists don’t work on their own projects. Just like you, they have a boss (government) and a job description. The word ‘scientific’ only means the procedure is ‘based on the methods and principles of science’, while the word ‘science’ actually means the ‘systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment’. Without natural world observation (empirical studies into peoples actual use of the Cannabis herb), it’s only an experimental claim.
The government can never legally justify any law and no scientist can claim their studies are objective if they censor and control the parameters of the study. These ‘Cannabis’ (read THC) studies are 100% completely manipulated and the results pre-determined to keep political control, and have nothing to do with harm reduction or Cannabis herb. That’s why this ridiculous ‘THC-scientific’ con won’t stand up in court and it’s only ever mentioned in the media. Eureka- you’ve got it!
This
3 part series will show you the bigger picture and explain how to deal
with the public, the 'scientists', the media and the government and
expose the con behind the illegal Prohibition of Cannabis.
Remember, if there was any
REAL danger, the government would be able to show it to you empirically
(not hypothetically or by using their own, grant-paid 'scientists'
(read prostitutes)). The fact that they cannot show you the harm
empirically means they are deliberately lying to remove your
freedoms
which is a crime against humanity that the government must be held
accountable for. We can never negotiate with the government until those
who implemented and enforced these tyrannical laws are brought to
justice.