Cannabis and Driving
Although it is sometimes asserted that skills, or using heavy machinery and driving a car would be adversely affected by Cannabis use, this is the unscientific voice of prejudice speaking.
This damaging fiction about Cannabis is widely promulgated,
premeditated calumny, for official tests and studies have demonstrated
that, with Cannabis use, no deterioration of the manual dexterity or
mental adroitness occurs. The opposite is established: with the use of
Cannabis heightened awareness is reported and increase in skills
observed.
The deleterious progressive intensification-by-quantity which occurs
with use of alcohol, tranquillisers and other toxic drugs (whose
biological action differs from Cannabis) is mendaciously asserted to
occur with non-toxic Cannabis too, in both official and other
propaganda, despite the specific and complete exoneration of Cannabis
from all such allegations, by replicable, clinical tests. Given the
brief to discover impairment if any, the Crancer Study from the
Washington Department of Motor Vehicles, confirms Cannabis has no
deleterious effects on driving ability.
Clinically tested, Cannabis is shown not to induce functional
impairments. Rather the reverse is confirmed: improvements in the
ability to concentrate and perform are demonstrated by recorded
results. The tests of skills in simulated driving performance of the
U.S. official Crancer Studies demonstrate that any quantity of
Cannabis, even huge amounts consumed by test subjects, is unable to
cause the slightest impairment of the brain function. Crancer finds:
"Simulated driving scores for subjects experiencing a normal social
marijuana 'high' and the same subjects under control conditions are not
significantly different. However. there are significantly more errors
for alcohol intoxicated than for control subjects.'
Moreover, increased quantity does not have deleterious results. To
quote Crancer again, both regular and novice smokers smoking three
times the effective dose:
"showed either no change or negligible improvements in their scores."
Thus, 'acute' effects (i.e. current or short-term use) show no
maltreatment, no abuse of the Cannabis consumer.
It cannot be discerned by looking at, talking to or testing the
abilities of a person that they have taken Cannabis. Cannabis has no
effect on the brain mechanisms controlling consciousness, speech,
co-ordination, etc.: a person functions normally. See official
empirical research: 'The Effects of Marijuana on Human Beings,' by
Professor A.T. Weil, M.D., Arizona College of Medicine and Professor
N.E. Zinberg, M.D., Harvard. Weil and Zinberg relate how on occasions,
some research subjects enjoying effects, thinking themselves "too
stoned" to perform adequately, would ask to be excused the tests, which
were nevertheless insisted upon. Then, on testing, subjects were
surprised and pleased to find themselves able to perform as well as, or
better than without Marijuana. This finding proved to be replicable.
(Also see 'Clinical and Psychological Effects of Marijuana in Man,'
Science. vol 162, Dec., 1968, pp. 1234-1242; Cannabis: The First
Controlled Experiment,' New Society, 16 Jan., 1969, pp. 85-86, by
Professors Weil & Zinberg et al.)
That users were "surprised" their tests' results confirmed no
decrements derive from the use of Cannabis, indicates they had been
prepossessed (read brainwashed) by false indoctrination.
Cannabis is not a narcotic, and
does not induce tiredness, drowsiness, torpor or drugged sleep.
Inducement of tiredness and drugged sleep is a fiction of toxic
substances which are fatal at some dose. There is no Lethal Dose Rating
for Cannabis which is a non-toxic substance incapable of causing death
in humans and animals at any dose. Nor does Cannabis interfere with
rest, for those who are tired or in need of sleep are able to sleep
normally. Patients and Cannabis users report enjoying sleep of the most
restful sort with incremented invigoration and energy on awakening.
Accurate language reflects that Cannabis may be referred to as: a safe
relaxant tonic.
Cannabis is not an hallucinogen.
Those parts of the brain including the mind, the psyche, pertaining to
consciousness, etc., are not deleteriously interfered with by Cannabis.
It is untruthful then to apply to Cannabis terms which are generally
used to describe the effects of drugs and substances which do adversely
affect brain function. In this context, such terminology as
'psychoactive' and 'psychotropic' is inadmissible. These words describe
substances which throughly change personality ad behaviour, measurably
impair brain function and/or induce psychical distortions and
hallucinations. For example, psychoactive alcohol can cause violent and
grievous changes of behaviour, destabilising normal social psychical
restraints and inhibitions (ref. 'Harm and Danger in Perspective,' in
Part Three of THE REPORT). Psychotropic hallucinogen Lioresal and other
prescription drugs cause hallucinations (ref. Martha Hirsch, in
Administrative Law Judge F.L. Young's review, quotes verbatim in Part
Four of THE REPORT). Psychotropic/psychoactive lysergic acid
diethylamide (LSD) distorts perceptions, and so on. Even in small
amounts. psychoactive/psychotropic drugs, such as alcohol, impair
performance. Although with alcohol the user may feel invigorated and
confident ("Dutch courage") when (clinically) tested the recorded
results of mental abilities and physical co-ordination consistently
show deterioration.
Objectivity and scruple deny absolutely the misapplication to Cannabis
of words such as narcotic, hallucinogen, psychoactive or psychotropic,
for this jargon befits psyche-distorting substances, hallucinogens,
narcotics and drugs, with their well-known and measurable mind
dysfunctions. The empirical tests of actual use of Cannabis herb
clinically confirm (i.e. they are replicable) categorically, Cannabis
does not induce any adversely altered perceptions or impairments of
brain function.
The 'Medical Anthropological Study of Chronic Marijuana Use,' conducted
in Jamaica by the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health, Center for
Studies of Narcotic and Drug Abuse, revealed that from high frequency,
long duration use (subjects averaged over 16 years of such use) of
Cannabis of greater potency than is generally available elsewhere,
there results:
"No impairment of physiological, sensory and perceptual motor
performance, tests of concept formations, abstracting ability, and
cognitive style, and tests of memory."
Thus, the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health Studies, taken
together with the comprehensive empirical researches of the U.S.-Costa
Rican Study (see EXORDIUM, Page 3 of THE REPORT) confirm long-term
Cannabis smoking and dietary use also show no abuse, no maltreatment of
the Cannabis consumer.
The biological action of Cannabis and
alcohol are completly different. Cannabis does not even effect those
parts of the brain that alcohol does that deal with motor function. In
fact, claiming that Cannabis impairs driving ability is the same as
claiming tomato's impair driving.
Remember, if there was any
REAL danger, the government would be able to show it to you empirically
(not hypothetically or by using their own, grant-paid 'scientists'
(read prostitutes)). The fact that they cannot show you the harm
empirically means they are deliberately lying to remove your
freedoms
which is a crime against humanity that the government must be held
accountable for. We can never negotiate with the government until those
who implemented and enforced these tyrannical laws are brought to
justice.