Legal Definitions and the Constitutional Court Case CCT 02/10


CON-stitutional Court Corruption, government control and manipulation, failure to follow their own 'Rules of the Court' and the inability for every and any human to access the court directly.

Did you know that you are NOT allowed direct access to the CONstitutional court of South Africa? Even though the rules of the court state the court is a court of first instance, the Registrar herself stated that no citizen may access the court as a court of first instance.

A ‘constitution’ is a code of laws and customs established by the people of a nation (as distinct from government and/or bureaucrats) for the guidance and the legal and lawful control of its government, by which to preclude tyranny and lawlessness; a constitution may be limited or amended only at the behest and by the active participation of the great mass of the people (not by government); and, ‘government’ is comprised of the executive, the legislature and the judiciary.
Being the legal means of controlling and limiting the power of government, a constitution is categorically not merely a document showing the hierarchical administration and departmental organisation of government, though it may also contain this.

Tyranny is defined as oppressive rule administered with injustice; the cruel and arbitrary use of authority.

Legem terræ is the people’s common "law of the land," comprised of timeless, universally applicable, supreme tenets of secular morality and law."

Legal Definitions

Everyone I speak to tells me that they know their Rights. But knowing your Rights and understanding how they work are two totally different things. We the people enter into a social contract with government whereby we agree that the government may have the power to govern as long as their actions are accountable and questionable to prevent abuse by the government. Because those in power ALWAYS abuse those beneath, we have Human Rights and these are represented in the Bill of Rights and Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

In any contract you enter into, if the party you enter into agreement with breaches the contract, it is YOUR duty to point it out. If the offending party does not rectify the matter, that is a breach of contract and the contract ends and falls away.

Because Human Rights are INDIVIDUAL (they are not issued in batches or to groups) it is your duty as an individual to point out the breaches by government TO GOVERNMENT of YOUR INDIVIDUAL HUMAN RIGHTS.

If you fail to do this, that allows the government to legally do anything they want to you because by default you have agreed by your silence. After all, if they were breaching your human rights, surely you would have said something?

Tyranny and oppression does not happen because of one dictator, but because the millions of people do not object when they see it.

Adolf Hitler even said how lucky for leaders that men do not think.
Remember, if there was any REAL danger, the government would be able to show it to you empirically (not hypothetically or by using their own, grant-paid 'scientists' (read prostitutes)). The fact that they cannot show you the harm empirically means they are deliberately lying to remove your freedoms which is a crime against humanity that the government must be held accountable for. We can never negotiate with the government until those who implemented and enforced these tyrannical laws are brought to justice.